|
"For the exceptionally low price we paid, this hotel was extremely good. Very spacious if somewhat dated rooms, included breakfast was quite good, and the location was reasonable (short 5min bus ride to main part of town). Current rates seem a lot higher than I paid a year ago, making the value a little suspect now. The service was quite good, especially considering the hotel was very busy at the time." - Andrew Busch
"We had a standard room for a special price (accordiing to a 3-star hotel), so other rooms may be better because it's a big hotel (290 rooms). Our room had no aircondition so it was very warm. Further: the room was very small, had only 1 chair, cheap furniture (bed small and cracky, thin matras) etc. Breakfast was sufficient, but simple: for example no scrambled eggs, no fish, no fresh fruit (only pieces of oranges). Staff was very helpfull despite the chaos of 9 arriving busses. Conclusion: good 3-star hotel, but certainly not a 4-star hotel." - Anonymous
"The beds were very hard. The meals were buffet only, there was no menu - and the meals left a bit to be desired. The location is about 5 kms from the Charles Bridge which made it difficult if you wanted to go into the City at night. We felt that public transit was not safe and it is a hassle to deal with the taxi's. One quote we received from the train station was for 1,450K. We actually took a taxi that cost us 300K." - Eleanor Paugh
"air conditioning was not working- room was clean. Double bed was two single beds put together. Overall really good hotel" - Sarah Morgan
|
| Rating criteria |
Rating |
| Cleanliness |
4.33 |
| Facilities |
3.67 |
| Service |
4 |
| Location |
3.33 |
| Pricing |
4.67 |
|
| Overall rating |
4 |
|
