|
"The Hotel King was in very bad condition. It was untidy (almost filthy), old and it looked like it hasnīt been renovated since the 80īs. In our room there were stains on the wall-to-wall carpet and on the walls. The bath tub was stale and there was some filth on the shower handle and the soap rack. The overall impression of the room was dark and dirty. The hotel was as a whole totally worn-out and altogether terrible. The only good thing was the location and the service wasnīt that bad either, the staff was quite helpfull. I would not recommend this hotel to anybody and I think it shouldnīt be on the market at all and it definitely shouldnīt be rated as a three-star hotel because it was barely a one-star hotel. You can truely get a lot better hotel with the same price which was really, really expensive. " - Anonymous
"Basic hotel but clean and tidy and in a great location.
Could have been a wider range of choice for breakfast." - Anonymous
"Overall, the stay was fine. However, the very first night we were placed in a room that didn't have a central airconditioning unit and the room felt like it was 100 degrees. If we had not complained several times, I'm sure we would not have been moved to another room. The last two nights were very comfortable. Location was very important for us and we found the location of this hotel to be extremely convenient. " - Anonymous
"Listing states it has wireless service, this was nonexistent. There was a hub, but no way to connect and the front desk stated there was none. Wireless was one of the primary reasons for selecting this location. Overall though, the location was very good for a walking tour of Rome." - George Van Buren
|
| Rating criteria |
Rating |
| Cleanliness |
3.25 |
| Facilities |
2.86 |
| Service |
3.49 |
| Location |
4.58 |
| Pricing |
3.31 |
|
| Overall rating |
3.5 |
|
